Inbred corn line ASG10

ABSTRACT

An inbred corn line, designated ASG10, is disclosed. The invention relates to the seeds of inbred corn line ASG10, to the plants of inbred corn line ASG10 and to methods for producing a corn plant produced by crossing the inbred line ASG10 with itself or another corn line. The invention further relates to hybrid corn seeds and lants produced by crossing the inbred line ASG10 with another corn line.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a new and distinctive corn inbred line, designated ASG10. There are numerous steps in the development of any novel, desirable plant germplasm. Plant breeding begins with the analysis and definition of problems and weaknesses of the current germplasm, the establishment of program goals, and the definition of specific breeding objectives. The next step is selection of germplasm that possess the traits to meet the program goals. The goal is to combine in a single variety or hybrid an improved combination of desirable traits from the parental germplasm. These important traits may include higher yield, resistance to diseases and insects, better stalks and roots, tolerance to drought and heat, and better agronomic quality.

Choice of breeding or selection methods depends on the mode of plant reproduction, the heritability of the trait(s) being improved, and the type of cultivar used commercially (e.g., F₁ hybrid cultivar, pureline cultivar, etc.). For highly heritable traits, a choice of superior individual plants evaluated at a single location will be effective, whereas for traits with low heritability, selection should be based on mean values obtained from replicated evaluations of families of related plants. Popular selection methods commonly include pedigree selection, modified pedigree selection, mass selection, and recurrent selection.

The complexity of inheritance influences choice of the breeding method. Backcross breeding is used to transfer one or a few favorable genes for a highly heritable trait into a desirable cultivar. This approach has been used extensively for breeding disease-resistant cultivars. Various recurrent selection techniques are used to improve quantitatively inherited traits controlled by numerous genes. The use of recurrent selection in self-pollinating crops depends on the ease of pollination, the frequency of successful hybrids from each pollination, and the number of hybrid offspring from each successful cross.

Each breeding program should include a periodic, objective evaluation of the efficiency of the breeding procedure. Evaluation criteria vary depending on the goal and objectives, but should include gain from selection per year based on comparisons to an appropriate standard, overall value of the advanced breeding lines, and number of successful cultivars produced per unit of input (e.g., per year, per dollar expended, etc.).

Promising advanced breeding lines are thoroughly tested and compared to appropriate standards in environments representative of the commercial target area(s) for three years at least. The best lines are candidates for new commercial cultivars; those still deficient in a few traits are used as parents to produce new populations for further selection. These processes, which lead to the final step of marketing and distribution, usually take from eight to 12 years from the time the first cross is made. Therefore, development of new cultivars is a time-consuming process that requires precise forward planning, efficient use of resources, and a minimum of changes in direction.

A most difficult task is the identification of individuals that are genetically superior, because for most traits the true genotypic value is masked by other confounding plant traits or environmental factors. One method of identifying a superior plant is to observe its performance relative to other experimental plants and to a widely grown standard cultivar. If a single observation is inconclusive, replicated observations provide a better estimate of its genetic worth.

The goal of plant breeding is to develop new, unique and superior corn inbred lines and hybrids. The breeder initially selects and crosses two or more parental lines, followed by repeated selfing and selection, producing many new genetic combinations. The breeder can theoretically generate billions of different genetic combinations via crossing, selfing and mutations. The breeder has no direct control at the cellular level. Therefore, two breeders will never develop the same line, or even very similar lines, having the same corn traits.

Each year, the plant breeder selects the germplasm to advance to the next generation. This germplasm is grown under unique and different geographical, climatic and soil conditions, and further selections are then made, during and at the end of the growing season. The inbred lines which are developed are unpredictable. This unpredictability is because the breeder's selection occurs in unique environments, with no control at the DNA level (using conventional breeding procedures), and with millions of different possible genetic combinations being generated. A breeder of ordinary skill in the art cannot predict the final resulting lines he develops, except possibly in a very gross and general fashion. The same breeder cannot produce the same line twice by using the exact same original parents and the same selection techniques. This unpredictability results in the expenditure of large research monies to develop a superior new corn inbred line.

The development of commercial corn hybrids requires the development of homozygous inbred lines, the crossing of these lines, and the evaluation of the crosses. Pedigree breeding and recurrent selection breeding methods are used to develop inbred lines from breeding populations. Breeding programs combine desirable traits from two or more inbred lines or various broad-based sources into breeding pools from which inbred lines are developed by selfing and selection of desired phenotypes. The new inbreds are crossed with other inbred lines and the hybrids from these crosses are evaluated to determine which have commercial potential.

Pedigree breeding is used commonly for the improvement of self-pollinating crops or inbred lines of cross-pollinating crops. Two parents which possess favorable, complementary traits are crossed to produce an F₁. An F₂ population is produced by selfing one or several F₁'s or by intercrossing two F₁'s (sib mating). Selection of the best individuals is usually begun in the F₂ population; then, beginning in the F₃, the best individuals in the best families are selected. Replicated testing of families, or hybrid combinations involving individuals of these families, often follows in the F₄ generation to improve the effectiveness of selection for traits with low heritability. At an advanced stage of inbreeding (i.e., F₆ and F₇), the best lines or mixtures of phenotypically similar lines are tested for potential release as new cultivars.

Mass and recurrent selections can be used to improve populations of either self- or cross-pollinating crops. A genetically variable population of heterozygous individuals is either identified or created by intercrossing several different parents. The best plants are selected based on individual superiority, outstanding progeny, or excellent combining ability. The selected plants are intercrossed to produce a new population in which further cycles of selection are continued.

Backcross breeding has been used to transfer genes for a simply inherited, highly heritable trait into a desirable homozygous cultivar or inbred line which is the recurrent parent. The source of the trait to be transferred is called the donor parent. After the initial cross, individuals possessing the phenotype of the donor parent are selected and repeatedly crossed (backcrossed) to the recurrent parent. The resulting plant is expected to have the attributes of the recurrent parent (e.g., cultivar) and the desirable trait transferred from the donor parent.

Descriptions of other breeding methods that are commonly used for different traits and crops can be found in one of several reference books (e.g., Allard, 1960; Simmonds, 1979; Sneep et al., 1979; Fehr, 1987).

Proper testing should detect any major faults and establish the level of superiority or improvement over current cultivars. In addition to showing superior performance, there must be a demand for a new cultivar that is compatible with industry standards or which creates a new market. The introduction of a new cultivar will incur additional costs to the seed producer, the grower, processor and consumer; for special advertising and marketing, altered seed and commercial production practices, and new product utilization. The testing preceding release of a new cultivar should take into consideration research and development costs as well as technical superiority of the final cultivar. For seed-propagated cultivars, it must be feasible to produce seed easily and economically.

Once the inbreds that give the best hybrid performance have been identified, the hybrid seed can be reproduced indefinitely as long as the homogeneity of the inbred parent is maintained. A single-cross hybrid is produced when two inbred lines are crossed to produce the F₁ progeny. A double-cross hybrid is produced from four inbred lines crossed in pairs (A×B and C×D) and then the two F₁ hybrids are crossed again (A×B)×(C×D). Much of the hybrid vigor exhibited by F₁ hybrids is lost in the next generation (F₂). Consequently, seed from hybrid varieties is not used for planting stock.

Corn is an important and valuable field crop. Thus, a continuing goal of plant breeders is to develop stable, high yielding corn hybrids that are agronomically sound. The reasons for this goal are obviously to maximize the amount of grain produced on the land used and to supply food for both animals and humans. To accomplish this goal, the corn breeder must select and develop corn plants that have the traits that result in superior parental lines for producing hybrids.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

According to the invention, there is provided a novel inbred corn line, designated ASG10. This invention thus relates to the seeds of inbred corn line ASG10, to the plants of inbred corn line ASG10 and to methods for producing a corn plant produced by crossing the inbred line ASG10 with itself or another corn line. This invention further relates to hybrid corn seeds and plants produced by crossing the inbred line ASG10 with another corn line.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

In the description and tables which follow, a number of terms are used. In order to provide a clear and consistent understanding of the specification and claims, including the scope to be given such terms, the following definitions are provided:

Yield (Bushels/Acre). The yield in bushels/acre is the actual yield of the grain at harvest adjusted to 15.5% moisture.

Moisture. The moisture is the actual percentage moisture of the grain at harvest.

GDU Silk. The GDU silk (also called heat unit silk) is the number of growing degree units (GDU) or heat units required for an inbred line or hybrid to reach silk emergence from the time of planting. Growing degree units are calculated by the Barger Method, where the heat units for a 24-hour period are: ${GDU} = {\frac{\left( {{Max}.\quad {+ \quad {Min}}} \right)}{2} - 50.}$

The highest maximum used is 86° F. and the lowest minimum used is 50° F. For each hybrid, it takes a certain number of GDUs to reach various stages of plant development. GDUs are a way of measuring plant maturity.

Stalk Lodging (STALK). This is a relative rating for stalk lodging, where a lower score or number indicates a lower amount of stalk lodging while a higher number indicates a higher level of stalk lodging is present.

Root Lodging (ROOT). This is a relative rating for root lodging, i.e., those plants that lean from a vertical axis at an approximate 30° angle or greater would be counted as root lodged. Root lodging is scored ranging from 1 to 9, with a score of “1” meaning excellent roots with low to zero root lodging, while the high score of 9 indicates a very high level of root lodging is present.

Stay Green (S.GR). Stay Green is a rating ranging from 1 to 9. A genotype having a rating of “1” has relatively dry and loose open husks combined with the remainder of the plant being relatively green and free of diseases. A high rating of “9” indicates a genotype having relatively green and wet husks on a plant with diseased and/or drying leaf tissue.

Plant Height. This is a measure of the height of the hybrid from the ground to the tip of the tassel, and is measured in centimeters.

Field Score (F.SC). This is a measure of the intactness of the plant at harvest time and is rated from 1 to 9. A rating of “1” means a relatively fully intact plant, where the plant has its tassel and leaves still on the plant. The highest score of 9 means a plant where the tassel and/or top portion of the plant and many of the leaves have been dislodged and broken off of the plant.

Ear Height (E.HT). The ear height is a measure from the ground to the ear node attachment, and is measured in centimeters.

Test Weight (T.WT). Test weight is the grain density measured in pounds per bushel.

Inbred corn line ASG10 is a yellow dent corn with superior characteristics, and provides an excellent parental line in crosses for producing first generation (F₁) hybrid corn.

ASG10 is a corn inbred line developed from the cross of ASG11×MBS402 which was then selfed and the pedigree system of plant breeding was then used to develop ASG10. Yield, stalk quality, root quality, disease tolerance, late plant greenness, late plant intactness, ear retention, pollen shedding ability, silking ability and corn borer tolerance were the criteria used to determine the rows from which ears were selected.

Inbred corn line ASG10 has the following morphologic and other characteristics (based primarily on data collected at Janesville, Wis.).

VARIETY DESCRIPTION INFORMATION

1. TYPE: Dent

2. REGION WHERE DEVELOPED: Northcentral U.S.

3. MATURITY: $\begin{matrix} {{From}\quad {emergence}\quad {to}\quad 50\% \quad {of}\quad {plants}\quad {in}\quad {silk}\text{:}} & {1479\quad {GDU}} \\ {{From}\quad {emergence}\quad {to}\quad 50\% \quad {of}\quad {plants}\quad {in}\quad {pollen}} & {1483\quad {GDU}} \end{matrix}$ ${GDU} = {\frac{\left\lbrack {{{Max}.\quad {Temp}.\quad \left( {\leq {86{^\circ}\quad {F.}}} \right)} + \quad {{Min}.\quad {Temp}.\quad \left( {\geq {50{^\circ}\quad {F.}}} \right)}} \right\rbrack}{2} - 50}$

4. PLANT:

Plant Height (to tassel tip): 161.0 cm

Ear Height (to base of top ear): 58.5 cm

Average Length of Top Ear Internode: 12.2 cm

Average number of Tillers: 0

Average Number of Ears per Stalk: 1.4

Anthocyanin of Brace Roots: Faint

5. LEAF:

Width of Ear Node Leaf: 8.5 cm

Length of Ear Node Leaf: 68.7 cm

Number of leaves above top ear: 6

Leaf Angle from 2nd Leaf above ear at anthesis to Stalk above leaf: 23°

Leaf Color: Medium Green—Munsell Code 5 GY 4/4

Leaf Sheath Pubescence (Rate on scale from 1=none to 9=like peach fuzz): 6

Marginal Waves (Rate on scale from 1=none to 9=many): 5

Longitudinal Creases (Rate on scale from 1=none to 9=many): 4

6. TASSEL:

Number of Lateral Branches: 4

Branch Angle from Central Spike: 32

Tassel Length (from top leaf collar to tassel top): 17.4 cm

Pollen Shed (Rate on scale from 0=male sterile to 9=heavy shed): 4

7a. EAR: (Unhusked Data)

Silk Color (3 days after emergency): Light Green

Fresh Husk Color (25 days after 50% silking): Light Green

Position of Ear: Upright

Husk Tightness (Rate on scale from 1=very loose to 9=very tight): 5

Husk Extension: Long (8-10 cm beyond ear tip)

7b. EAR: (Husked Ear Data)

Ear Length: 14.4 cm

Ear Diameter at mid-point: 3.9 cm

Ear Weight: 105.7 gm

Number of Kernel Rows: 14

Kernel Rows: Distinct

Row Alignment: Slightly Curved

Shank Length: 5.0 cm

Ear Taper: Average

8. KERNEL: (Dried)

Kernel Length: 9.9 mm

Kernel Width: 7.6 mm

Kernel Thickness: 4.8 mm

Aleurone Color Pattern: Homozygous

Aleurone Color: Yellow

Hard Endosperm Color—Yellow Munsell code 2.5Y 8/8

Endosperm Type: Normal Starch

9. COB:

Cob diameter at mid-point: 14.9 mm

Cob Color: Pink

This invention is also directed to methods for producing a corn plant by crossing a first parent corn plant with a second parent corn plant, wherein the first or second corn plant is the inbred corn plant from the line ASG10. Further, both first and second parent corn plants may be from the inbred line ASG10. Therefore, any methods using the inbred corn line ASG10 are part of this invention: selfing, backcrosses, hybrid breeding, and crosses to populations. Any plants produced using inbred corn line ASG10 as a parent are within the scope of this invention. Advantageously, the inbred corn line is used in crosses with other corn varieties to produce first generation (F₁) corn hybrid seed and plants with superior characteristics.

As used herein, the term “plant” includes plant cells, plant protoplasts, plant cell of tissue culture from which corn plants can be regenerated, plant calli, plant clumps, and plant cells that are intact in plants or parts of plants, such as pollen, flowers, kernels, ears, cobs, leaves, husks, stalks, and the like.

Tissue culture of corn is described in European Patent Application, Publication No. 160,390, incorporated herein by reference. Corn tissue culture procedures are also described in Green and Rhodes, “Plant Regeneration in Tissue Culture of Maize”, Maize for Biological Research (Plant Molecular Biology Association, Charlottesville, Va. 1982), at 367-372. Thus, another aspect of this invention is to provide for cells which upon growth and differentiation produce the inbred line ASG10.

ASG11 and MBS402, the progenitors of ASG10, are proprietary field corn inbred lines of Asgrow Seed Company and MBS, Inc. of Story City, Iowa, respectively.

ASG10 is most similar to ASG11, however there are numerous differences including higher yield per acre, lower moisture and lower ear height.

Some of the criteria used to select ears in various generations include: yield, stalk quality, root quality, disease tolerance, late plant greenness, late season plant intactness, ear retention, pollen shedding ability, silking ability, and corn borer tolerance. During the development of the line, crosses were made to inbred testers for the purpose of estimating the line's general and specific combining ability, and evaluations were run by the Janesville, Wis. Breeding Station. The inbred was evaluated further as a line and in numerous crosses by Janesville and other breeding stations across the Corn Belt. The inbred has proven to have a very good combining ability in hybrid combinations.

The inbred line has shown uniformity and stability for the traits, as described in the following variety description information. It has been self-pollinated a sufficient number of generations with careful attention to uniformity of plant type. The line has been increased with continued observation for uniformity.

TABLES

In the tables that follow, the traits and characteristics of inbred corn line ASG10 are given in hybrid combination. The data collected on inbred corn line ASG10 is presented for the key characteristics and traits. The tables present yield test information about ASG10. ASG10 was tested in several hybrid combinations at numerous locations, with two or three replications per location. Information about these hybrids, as compared to several check hybrids, is presented.

The first pedigree listed in the comparison group is the hybrid containing ASG10. Information for the pedigree includes:

In column 1, the first genotype listed (in row 1) is the hybrid containing ASG10 and the second genotype listed in row 2 is another hybrid. Statistical information including the LSD, probability, number of tests and number of years are shown in rows 3 through 6 of each table. Columns 2, 3 and 4 show the bushels/acre, moisture and yield to moisture ratio for each genotype. In columns 5, 6 and 7 information for the genotype includes: stalk lodging (STALK), root lodging (ROOT) and stay green scores (S.GR). Columns 8, 9 and 10 indicate the fall scores (F.SC), ear height (E.HT) and test weight (T.WT).

The series of hybrids listed under the hybrid containing 6757 are considered check hybrids. These check hybrids are compared to hybrids containing the inbred ASG10.

TABLE 1 BU/A MOIST Y:MO STALK ROOTS S.GR F.SC E.HT T.WT ASG10/LH185 162.4 20.90 148.7 2.889 1.333 5.550 4.340 56.00 LH227/LH185 155.3 20.35 142.8 2.954 1.929 5.000 4.708 54.57 LSD .05 (95% confidence) 4.236 .585 4.991 .436 .361 .780 .294 .646 Probability of equal means .001 .069 .023 .767 .002 .157 .016 .000 Number of tests compared 63 63 63 54 42 20 53 59 Number of years 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

TABLE 2 BU/A MOIST Y:MO STALK ROOTS S.GR F.SC E.HT T.WT ASG10/LH185 179.4 20.80 166.0 7.450 1.585 6.737 4.828 90.20 57.76 LH235/LH185 178.4 24.18 156.7 7.382 2.651 3.382 3.882 110.2 55.40 LSD .05 (95% confidence) 4.305 .472 4.596 2.186 .497 .656 .324 3.583 .363 Probability of equal means .647 .000 .000 .950 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 Number of tests compared 106 106 106 88 53 38 93 44 99 Number of years 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

TABLE 3 BU/A MOIST Y:MO STALK ROOTS S.GR F.SC E.HT T.WT ASG10/LH185 179.4 20.78 166.0 7.090 1.525 6.650 4.778 90.20 57.63 LH236/LH185 177.1 24.98 153.3 6.866 2.221 3.175 3.838 104.0 57.06 LSD .05 (95% confidence) 3.680 .426 4.011 1.663 .362 .586 .326 6.325 301 Probability of equal means .217 .000 .000 .788 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 Number of tests compared 118 118 118 96 61 40 99 44 111 Number of years 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

TABLE 4 BU/A MOIST Y:MO STALK ROOTS S.GR F.SC E.HT T.WT ASG10/LH185 178.7 20.80 165.3 6.771 1.492 6.650 4.802 90.20 57.60 LH195/LH185 167.7 23.95 146.6 3.580 1.877 3.863 3.673 97.34 56.32 LSD .05 (95% confidence) 4.133 .481 4.522 1.781 .287 .489 .284 3.540 .318 Probability of equal means .000 .000 .000 .001 .009 .000 .000 .000 .000 Number of tests compared 124 124 124 102 65 40 101 44 117 Number of years 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

TABLE 5 BU/A MOIST Y:MO STALK ROOTS S.GR F.SC E.HT T.WT ASG10/LH185 187.9 20.88 174.3 10.71 1.800 7.286 5.212 92.42 58.17 LH234/LH185 182.2 23.05 163.3 7.656 2.333 5.214 4.970 102.1 57.18 LSD .05 (95% confidence) 8.301 .650 8.690 3.563 .723 .861 .558 5.590 .493 Probability of equal means .177 .000 .016 .097 .135 .000 .391 .002 .000 Number of tests compared 37 37 37 32 15 14 33 24 35 Number of years 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

TABLE 6 BU/A MOIST Y:MO STALK ROOTS S.GR F.SC E.HT T.WT ASG10/LH185 187.9 20.88 174.3 10.71 1.800 7.286 5.212 92.42 58.17 LH233/LH185 180.0 22.33 162.8 6.812 2.800 3.929 4.212 104.8 55.01 LSD .05 (95% confidence) 7.461 .838 8.691 3.687 .757 .895 .522 3.322 .529 Probability of equal means .041 .001 .012 .043 .013 .000 .001 .000 .000 Number of tests compared 37 37 37 32 15 14 33 24 35 Number of years 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

TABLE 7 BU/A MOIST Y:MO STALK ROOTS S.GR F.SC E.HT T.WT ASG10/LH185 176.9 20.86 163.3 6.080 1.453 6.458 4.786 90.20 57.30 PI3394 169.7 20.68 156.7 5.095 1.533 5.260 4.205 113.9 57.42 LSD .05 (95% confidence) 3.275 .307 3.265 1.280 .226 .481 .283 3.038 .279 Probability of equal means .000 .258 .000 .126 .482 .000 .000 .000 .391 Number of tests compared 142 142 142 120 75 48 117 44 135 Number of years 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

TABLE 8 BU/A MOIST Y:MO STALK ROOTS S.GR F.SC E.HT T.WT ASG10/LH185 176.9 20.86 163.3 6.080 1.453 6.458 4.786 90.20 57.3 PI3489 173.4 21.07 159.5 6.262 1.560 5.198 4.756 97.36 57.32 LSD .05 (95% confidence) 4.334 .298 4.238 1.532 .267 .434 .268 5.550 271 Probability of equal means .102 .157 .070 .813 .427 .000 .824 .013 .875 Number of tests compared 142 142 142 120 75 48 117 44 135 Number of years 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

TABLE 9 BU/A MOIST Y:MO STALK ROOTS S.GR F.SC E.HT T.WT ASG10/LH185 176.9 22.00 160.6 2.450 1.150 5.500 4.105 56.82 PI3563 165.2 20.49 152.5 2.600 1.450 4.643 4.105 57.71 LSD .05 (95% confidence) 4.537 .663 4.816 .313 .342 .674 .536 Probability of equal means .000 .000 .002 .330 .083 .017 1.000 .002 Number of tests compared 29 29 29 20 20 14 19 29 Number of years 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

TABLE 10 BU/A MOIST Y:MO STALK ROOTS S.GR F.SC E.HT T.WT ASG10/LH185 183.1 21.17 168.7 7.228 1.472 6.522 4.791 90.20 57.84 DK591 176.5 21.12 162.3 8.395 1.821 4.957 5.231 114.3 55.87 LSD .05 (95% confidence) 3.500 .423 3.790 1.353 .351 .464 .374 5.290 .266 Probability of equal means .000 .840 .001 .088 .052 .000 .021 .000 .000 Number of tests compared 108 108 108 86 53 46 91 44 105 Number of years 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

TABLE 11 BU/A MOIST Y:MO STALK ROOTS S.GR F.SC E.HT T.WT ASG10/LH176 165.3 16.45 162.0 5.401 1.000 5.333 5.429 99.90 57.75 LH227/LH176 158.5 16.78 154.6 4.078 2.800 3.000 5.286 103.2 55.64 LSD .05 (95% confidence) 7.891 .543 7.849 2.904 2.695 1.433 .593 9.695 .499 Probability of equal means .086 .208 .061 .343 .137 .020 .612 .461 .000 Number of tests compared 14 14 14 14 5 3 14 10 14 Number of years 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

TABLE 12 BU/A MOIST Y:MO STALK ROOTS S.GR F.SC E.HT T.WT ASG10/LH176 165.3 16.45 162.0 8.332 1.000 5.333 5.429 99.90 57.75 PI3753 158.3 17.28 153.6 12.86 2.750 7.000 5.500 110.0 57.42 LSD .05 (95% confidence) 7.428 .568 7.405 4.992 1.927 6.248 1.073 10.14 .772 Probability of equal means .064 .008 .028 .073 .067 .370 .888 .051 .377 Number of tests compared 14 14 14 18 6 3 14 10 14 Number of years 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

TABLE 13 BU/A MOIST Y:MO STALK ROOTS S.GR F.SC E.HT T.WT ASG10/LH176 165.3 16.45 162.0 8.332 1.000 5.333 5.429 99.90 57.75 PI3751 160.9 17.59 155.3 11.53 1.833 5.667 5.071 101.6 55.46 LSD .05 (95% confidence) 10.07 .623 10.06 4.727 1.681 5.168 .536 12.73 .779 Probability of equal means .365 .002 .171 .172 .259 .808 .174 .770 .000 Number of tests compared 14 14 14 18 6 3 14 10 14 Number of years 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

TABLE 14 BU/A MOIST Y:MO STALK ROOTS S.GR F.SC E.HT T.WT ASG10/LH176 165.3 16.45 162.0 8.332 1.000 5.333 5.429 99.90 57.75 DK442 152.8 16.68 149.1 13.81 1.750 5.000 5.357 110.7 54.75 LSD .05 (95% confidence) 7.220 .555 7.371 3.138 1.684 3.792 .861 10.00 .777 Probability of equal means .003 .380 .002 .002 .304 .742 .861 .037 .000 Number of tests compared 14 14 14 18 6 3 14 10 14 Number of years 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

TABLE 15 BU/A MOIST Y:MO STALK ROOTS S.GR F.SC E.HT T.WT ASG10/LH176 165.3 16.45 162.0 8.332 1.000 5.333 5.429 99.90 57.75 DK471 163.7 17.35 158.8 8.809 1.833 4.667 4.857 96.70 54.05 LSD .05 (95% confidence) 6.397 .554 6.804 2.485 .428 7.584 .869 9.408 .849 Probability of equal means .605 .004 .320 .690 .004 .742 .179 .462 .000 Number of tests compared 14 14 14 18 6 3 14 10 14 Number of years 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

TABLE 16 BU/A MOIST Y:MO STALK ROOTS S.GR F.SC E.HT T.WT ASG10/LH177 164.0 17.80 158.0 3.571 1.800 7.000 5.000 104.1 58.37 LH227/LH177 157.5 17.05 153.1 5.671 3.600 4.667 5.214 108.2 56.10 LSD .05 (95% confidence) 11.02 .745 11.80 1.841 2.548 6.248 .822 9.418 .678 Probability of equal means .227 .048 .391 .028 .121 .250 .583 .351 .000 Number of tests compared 14 14 14 14 5 3 14 10 14 Number of years 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

TABLE 17 BU/A MOIST Y:MO STALK ROOTS S.GR F.SC E.HT T.WT ASG10/LH177 164.0 17.80 158.0 6.300 1.667 7.000 5.000 104.1 58.37 PI3753 158.3 17.28 153.6 12.86 2.750 7.000 5.500 110.0 57.42 LSD .05 (95% confidence) 8.243 .574 8.284 6.196 3.120 1.103 10.18 .807 Probability of equal means .164 .071 .270 .039 .413 1.000 .346 .223 .025 Number of tests compared 14 14 14 18 6 3 14 10 14 Number of years 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

TABLE 18 BU/A MOIST Y:MO STALK ROOTS S.GR F.SC E.HT T.WT ASG10/LH177 164.0 17.80 158.0 6.300 1.667 7.000 5.000 104.1 58.37 PI3751 160.9 17.59 155.3 11.53 1.833 5.667 5.071 101.6 55.46 LSD .05 (95% confidence) 11.71 .423 11.81 4.438 .428 1.433 .799 12.27 .544 Probability of equal means .585 .306 .630 .024 .363 .057 .850 .656 .000 Number of tests compared 14 14 14 18 6 3 14 10 14 Number of years 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

TABLE 19 BU/A MOIST Y:MO STALK ROOTS S.GR F.SC E.HT T.WT ASG10/LH177 164.0 17.80 158.0 6.300 1.667 7.000 5.000 104.1 58.37 DK442 152.8 16.68 149.1 13.81 1.750 5.000 5.357 110.7 54.75 LSD .05 (95% confidence) 9.868 .560 10.42 3.729 .214 .000 .865 8.864 .737 Probability of equal means .030 .001 .089 .001 .363 .000 .389 .127 000 Number of tests compared 14 14 14 18 6 3 14 10 14 Number of years 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

TABLE 20 BU/A MOIST Y:MO STALK ROOTS S.GR F.SC E.HT T.WT ASG10/LH177 164.0 17.80 158.0 6.300 1.667 7.000 5.000 104.1 58.37 DK471 163.7 17.35 158.8 8.809 1.833 4.667 4.857 96370 54.05 LSD .05 (95% confidence) 6.382 .518 6.737 3.225 1.681 3.792 1.106 9.172 .648 Probability of equal means .940 .086 .800 .119 .809 .118 .785 .102 .000 Number of tests compared 14 14 14 18 6 3 14 10 14 Number of years 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

TABLE 21 BU/A MOIST Y:MO STALK ROOTS S.GR F.SC E.HT T.WT A5810/LH168 157.2 19.66 146.4 5.690 1.082 4.894 5.050 102.0 58.28 PI3563 160.0 20.27 147.7 4.885 1.643 3.553 3.963 105.6 57.19 LSD .05 (95% confidence) 5.857 .608 5.624 1.106 .451 .506 .261 2.887 1.304 Probability of equal means .335 .047 .642 .148 .016 .000 .000 .016 .100 Number of tests compared 130 130 130 124 49 47 120 56 127 Number of years 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

TABLE 22 BU/A MOIST Y:MO STALK ROOTS S.GR F.SC E.HT T.WT ASG10/LH168 149.0 20.08 137.6 4.249 1.167 4.227 5.028 103.9 58.10 PI3751 145.1 18.16 138.1 8.312 2.042 5.591 5.708 108.7 55.98 LSD .05 (95% confidence) 5.040 .299 5.308 1.697 .639 .557 .356 5.276 .655 Probability of equal means .120 .000 .864 .000 .009 .000 .000 .075 .000 Number of tests compared 55 55 55 60 24 22 53 20 54 Number of years 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

TABLE 23 BU/A MOIST Y:MO STALK ROOTS S.GR F.SC E.HT T.WT ASG10/MBS501 168.7 19.64 158.2 8.662 1.286 7.130 5.969 91.53 56.63 PI3563 164.5 19.72 153.4 5.886 1.757 4.174 3.944 105.8 56.90 LSD .05 (95% confidence) 7.440 .727 6.998 1.899 .554 .670 .396 4.725 1.344 Probability of equal means .255 .829 .172 .005 .098 .000 .000 .000 .690 Number of tests compared 85 85 85 79 35 23 81 36 83 Number of years 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

TABLE 24 BU/A MOIST Y:MO STALK ROOTS S.GR F.SC E.HT T.WT ASG10/LH181 173.5 22.39 156.2 5.698 1.100 5.250 4.125 108.8 58.34 PI3489 175.1 22.96 156.4 9.254 1.200 4.417 4.219 96.45 57.06 LSD .05 (95% confidence) 6.288 .584 6.546 2.678 .527 1.349 .519 6.133 .567 Probability of equal means .600 .057 .946 .012 .678 .201 .720 .000 .000 Number of tests compared 34 34 34 33 10 12 32 22 32 Number of years 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

TABLE 25 BU/A MOIST Y:MO STALK ROOTS S.GR F.SC E.HT T.WT ASG10/LH181 173.5 22.39 156.2 5.698 1.100 5.250 4.125 108.8 58.34 PI3563 169.7 20.23 157.6 6.441 2.250 4.250 4.219 106.1 57.73 LSD .05 (95% confidence) 5.936 .507 6.312 3.044 1.876 1.117 .591 6.251 .494 Probability of equal means .208 .000 .658 .629 .199 .074 .753 .382 .020 Number of tests compared 34 34 34 33 10 12 32 22 32 Number of years 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

TABLE 26 BU/A MOIST Y:MO STALK ROOTS S.GR F.SC E.HT T.WT ASG10/LH169 166.3 18.75 158.0 8.734 1.000 5.333 5.214 102.8 57.01 PI3563 157.0 20.77 143.7 7.225 2.333 3.667 4.500 100.5 56.59 LSD .05 (95% confidence) 8.946 1.346 9.341 2.936 1.580 5.733 .657 8.939 .521 Probability of equal means .042 .007 .006 .293 .082 .338 .035 .575 .107 Number of tests compared 14 14 14 18 6 3 14 10 14 Number of years 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

TABLE 27 BU/A MOIST Y:MO STALK ROOTS S.GR F.SC E.HT T.WT ASG10/LH169 166.3 18.75 158.0 8.734 1.000 5.333 5.214 102.8 57.01 PI3751 160.0 17.90 153.5 10.55 1.667 5.000 5.214 100.0 55.78 LSD .05 (95% confidence) 12.34 .720 12.42 3.300 1.271 1.433 8.575 .933 Probability of equal means .286 .023 .453 .262 .235 .423 1.000 .479 .014 Number of tests compared 14 14 14 18 6 3 14 10 14 Number of years 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

TABLE 28 BU/A MOIST Y:MO STALK ROOTS S.GR F.SC E.HT T.WT ASG10/MBS4681 179.3 18.95 170.6 14.39 1.000 6.250 5.615 105.0 57.74 PI3489 172.5 21.98 156.3 10.47 3.333 3.000 5.077 100.0 56.70 LSD .05 (95% confidence) 10.45 1.202 11.90 5.508 10.03 2.001 .944 44.76 .989 Probability of equal means .184 .000 .022 .146 .423 .014 .237 .678 .040 Number of tests compared 15 15 15 12 3 4 13 3 15 Number of years 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

TABLE 29 BU/A MOIST Y:MO STALK ROOTS S.GR F.SC E.HT T.WT ASG10/MBS4681 179.3 18.95 170.6 14.39 1.000 6.250 5.615 105.0 57.74 PI3563 177.2 19.14 168.1 10.44 1.000 3.000 5.077 110.0 58.03 LSD 05 (95% confidence) 13.40 .823 14.07 7.701 1.522 .841 21.5 .541 Probability of equal means .735 .632 .704 .283 1.000 .007 .188 .423 .270 Number of tests compared 15 15 15 12 3 4 13 3 15 Number of years 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

DEPOSIT INFORMATION

A deposit of the Asgrow Seed Company proprietary inbred corn line ASG10 disclosed above and recited in the appended claims has been made with the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), 10801 University Boulevard, Manassas, Va. 20110. The date of deposit was Apr. 14, 1999. The deposit of 2,500 seeds were taken from the same deposit maintained by Asgrow Seed Company since prior to the filing date of this application. All restrictions upon the deposit have been removed, and the deposit is intended to meet all of the requirements of 37 C.F.R. §1.801-1.809. The ATCC accession number is ATCC 203934. The deposit will be maintained in the depository for a period of 30 years, or 5 years after the last request, or for the effective life of the patent, whichever is longer, and will be replaced as necessary during that period. 

What is claimed is:
 1. An inbred corn seed designated ASG10 and having ATCC Accession No.
 203934. 2. A plant or its parts produced by the seed of claim
 1. 3. Pollen of the plant of claim
 2. 4. An ovule of the plant of claim
 2. 5. A corn plant having the physiological and morphological characteristics of the plant of claim
 2. 6. Tissue culture of the plant of claim
 2. 7. A corn plant regenerated from the tissue culture of claim 6, wherein said corn plant is capable of expressing all the physiological and morphological characteristics of inbred corn line ASG10.
 8. A method for producing a hybrid corn seed comprising crossing a first inbred parent corn plant with a second inbred parent corn plant and harvesting the resultant hybrid corn seed, wherein said first or second parent corn plant is the corn plant of claim
 2. 9. A hybrid seed produced by the method of claim
 8. 10. A hybrid plant or its parts produced by growing said hybrid corn seed of claim
 9. 11. Seed produced from said hybrid plant of claim
 10. 12. A method for producing a hybrid corn seed comprising crossing an inbred plant according to claim 2 with another, different corn plant.
 13. A hybrid seed produced by the method of claim
 12. 14. A hybrid plant or its parts produced by growing said hybrid corn seed of claim
 13. 15. Seed produced from said hybrid plant of claim
 14. 